LIVE — Last crawled: 2026-09-29 17:35 JST
Vol.1 — September 30, 2026
MSC Portal ›Regulatory Watch› All Entries (129)
Standards, Guidance & Notices
Showing 11–20 of 129
FDA
CDRH
fda_20260528_human_factors
Content of Human Factors Information in Medical Device Marketing Submissions
FINAL Usability
Final guidance issued by FDA CDRH on May 29, 2026 (finalizing the December 2022 draft) that provides a risk-based framework for the human factors information to include in 510(k), De Novo, PMA and HDE submissions; combination products are not addressed. Submitters determine one HF Submission Category per submission using a flowchart based on the use-related risk analysis (URRA): whether the device is a modification; whether the user interface, intended users, uses, use environments, training or labeling change; whether there are critical tasks (new or impacted, for modified devices); and whether human factors validation data are needed given the user interface history of use, its complexity and the adequacy of existing risk controls. Category 1 calls for a conclusion and high-level summary; Category 2 adds a rationale and descriptions of users, uses, environments, training, the user interface and known use problems; Category 3 calls for a full HFE/UE report including the URRA, critical tasks and human factors validation testing. Worked examples are included; for instance, a change to a computer-assisted detection algorithm with no user interface change falls into Category 1. The guidance is a companion to Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices. FDA generally does not anticipate the newly recommended information in submissions pending at publication or received before August 1, 2026. Docket FDA-2015-D-4599.
Published: 2026-05-29
EU
MDCG
Borderline Manual
Manual on borderline and classification for medical devices under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (Version 5, April 2026)
PUBLISHED NEW SaMD Classification & Approval
Version 5 (April 2026) of the manual recording agreements reached by the competent authorities of the Member State members of the Borderline and Classification Working Group (BCWG), a subgroup of the MDCG, through the Helsinki Procedure under the MDR and IVDR. It presents the background and outcome of cases on qualification (borderlines between medical devices or IVDs and medicinal products, biocides, cosmetics, personal protective equipment and other products) and on the application of classification rules. Software-related cases include a smartphone application for STI prevention strategies (information exchange between users and a behaviour-based risk calculator do not constitute a medical purpose, so it is not a medical device) and medical calculators (calculating scores such as CHA2DS2-VASc goes beyond simple search, so the product is a medical device, classified at least class IIa under Rule 11). Cases added in Version 5 include packaging for administering a medicinal product, a penis holster, a syringe containing glass beads, needles for root canal irrigation and saline solutions for nasal irrigation. The manual is to be read with MDCG 2019-11 (software qualification and classification), MDCG 2021-24, MDCG 2022-5 and other guidance. It is not legally binding, does not reflect the official position of the European Commission, and decisions on individual products remain with national competent authorities.
Published: 2026-04-22
NIST
IR
IR 8259 Rev. 1
Foundational Cybersecurity Activities for IoT Product Manufacturers
PUBLISHED Cybersecurity
Internet of Things (IoT) products often lack product cybersecurity capabilities their customers—organizations and individuals—can use to help mitigate their cybersecurity risks. Manufacturers can help their customers by improving the securability of their IoT products by providing necessary cybersecurity functionality and by providing customers with the cybersecurity-related information they need. This publication describes recommended activities related to cybersecurity that manufacturers should consider performing before their IoT products are sold to customers. These foundational cybersecurity activities can help manufacturers lessen the cybersecurity-related efforts needed by customers, which in turn can reduce the prevalence and severity of compromises.
Published: 2026-04-20
EU
MDCG
Borderline Background Note
Background note on the use of the Manual on borderline and classification for medical devices under the Directives
PUBLISHED NEW SaMD Classification & Approval
Background note explaining that the manual on borderline and classification issued in May 2019 under the old medical device Directives (such as 93/42/EEC) remains available as a reference resource even after the new manual under the MDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/745) and IVDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/746) became operative in September 2022. It applies for as long as devices CE-marked under the old Directives remain on the market, and is maintained by the Borderline and Classification Working Group (BCWG) under the MDCG. It is non-binding guidance.
Published: 2026-04-01
EU
MDCG
MDCG 2021-24 Rev.1
Guidance on classification of medical devices
PUBLISHED SaMD Classification & Approval
Revision 1 of MDCG 2021-24 (guidance on classification of medical devices under the EU MDR), published 20 April 2026. It clarifies terminology by replacing the word "surgical" with "clinical" in the invasiveness definition, and updates the tables and practical notes for Classification Rules 2, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16 and 22. Based on the sources reviewed, the software classification rule (Rule 11) itself was not amended in this revision.
Published: 2026-04-01
FDA
CDRH
fda_20260327_patient_preference_tplc
FDA Issues Final Guidance on Incorporating Voluntary Patient Preference Information Over the Total Product Life Cycle
FINAL SaMD Classification & Approval
FDA CDRH issued final guidance on the collection and submission of patient preference information (PPI). It includes recommendations on study design, validation, and the integration of PPI across the total product life cycle, and provides a roadmap for sponsors incorporating the patient perspective into regulatory submissions.
Published: 2026-03-27
MHLW
Notice
Admin-Notice-2026-03-25_SaMDQA3
Q&A Regarding Handling of Medical Device Software (Part 3) (Administrative Notice, March 25, 2026)
NEW SaMD Classification & Approval
Q&A (Part 3) issued by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), clarifying when manufacturing/marketing and sales activities are deemed to begin for home-use medical device software (SaMD) distributed via app stores or download servers. Manufacturing/marketing is deemed to start when the software is made available on a download server or app store, while sales is deemed to start when the end user is able to use it. Issued 25 March 2026 in response to a growing number of approved home-use device programs. It also confirms that a company acting as both marketing authorization holder and seller needs both business licenses (or notifications), and that legally required labeling information may be provided via easily accessible electronic records rather than a printed insert, provided it is given to the user before use.
Published: 2026-03-26
MHLW
Notice
Admin-Notice-2026-03-19_VPNSecurity
Notice on Strengthening Cybersecurity Measures for Network Devices such as VPN Equipment Connected to Medical Devices (Caution Alert) (Administrative Notice, March 19, 2026)
NEW Cybersecurity
Caution alert (administrative notice, 19 March 2026) issued by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in response to a rise in ransomware attacks that exploit VPN equipment and other network devices connected to medical devices. It calls on marketing authorization holders to (1) confirm, under maintenance contracts with healthcare facilities, who is responsible for managing attached network equipment such as VPN devices, (2) check that firmware is up to date and identify any devices that are no longer supported, and (3) strengthen security by informing facilities about unsupported devices and applying stronger authentication and access control.
Published: 2026-03-25
MHLW
Notice
MHLW-PFSB-MDED-0306-No.1
Notice MHLW-PFSB-MDED-0306-No.1 on Handling of Registration Applications for Registered Conformity Assessment Bodies (March 6, 2026)
NEW SaMD Classification & Approval
Notice (MHLW-PFSB-MDED-0306-No.1, 6 March 2026) issued by the Medical Device Evaluation Division setting out procedures for the registration and operation of Registered Conformity Assessment Bodies (RCABs) for medical devices and in vitro diagnostics in Japan. It principally implements a new succession-of-status scheme introduced by the 2025 amendment to the PMD Act (Act No. 37 of 2025), covering business transfers, inheritance, mergers, and demergers of RCABs. The notice also covers registration application procedures and the registration license tax (JPY 90,000), notification requirements for suspension or discontinuation of business (at least two weeks before the planned date), operating rules aligned with ISO/IEC 17021-1 and 17065, restrictions on consulting activities that could compromise confidentiality or impartiality, and detailed succession procedures beginning with prior consultation six months in advance. The notice takes effect on 1 May 2026.
Published: 2026-03-06
MHLW
Notice
MHLW-PFSB-MDED-0306-No.4
Notice MHLW-PFSB-MDED-0306-No.4 on Establishment of Witness Inspection Implementation Standards for Registered Conformity Assessment Bodies and Partial Revision of On-site Inspection Standards (March 6, 2026)
NEW SaMD Classification & Approval
Notice (MHLW-PFSB-MDED-0306-No.4, 6 March 2026) establishing implementation standards for a new witness inspection scheme for Registered Conformity Assessment Bodies (RCABs) and partially revising the existing on-site inspection standards. The witness inspection scheme, introduced under the 2025 amendment to the PMD Act (Act No. 37 of 2025), aims to maintain and standardize the assessment capabilities of RCABs. Under it, MHLW and PMDA staff observe an RCAB conformity assessment roughly once a year, with at least two officials attending and with the consent of the assessed facility, carried out in a manner intended not to affect the assessment itself. The revised on-site inspection standards separate out the witness inspection procedure and newly require RCABs to make efforts so that the assessed facility understands and agrees to accept a witness inspection. The notice takes effect on 1 May 2026.
Published: 2026-03-06
‹ 1 2 3 4 … 13 ›