Standards, Guidance & Notices
Showing 31–40 of 76
FDA
CDRH
CDRH
FDA-AI-DSF-Draft-2025
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Device Software Functions: Lifecycle Management and Marketing Submission Recommendations
FDA draft guidance (January 2025) on lifecycle management and marketing submissions for AI/ML-enabled SaMD. It provides specific recommendations on training data management, performance monitoring, and change management (PCCP: Predetermined Change Control Plan), including recommendations on handling adaptive algorithms and on describing postmarket performance monitoring plans. Still at the draft stage, pending finalization.
Published: 2025-01-07
JFMDA
Notice
Notice
jfmda_20241226_146b6000
Guidance for Companies on the Development of AI Medical Devices Using Pseudonymously Processed Information, Version 1.0
On December 25, 2024, Team 1 of the JFMDA Subcommittee on Handling of Personal Information compiled and published the "Guidance for Companies on the Development of AI Medical Devices Using Pseudonymously Processed Information, Version 1.0." On the same date, the Medical Device Evaluation Division of the MHLW Pharmaceutical Safety Bureau issued an administrative notice providing information on the guidance. As explained in Chapter 0 (Background and Purpose) of the guidance, developing AI-enabled medical devices generally requires large volumes of medical data, such as clinical information, images (CT, MRI, etc.), and other non-text information (ECG, EEG, etc.). However, medical information held by medical institutions generally constitutes personal data under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information, and it is usually not collected for the purpose of AI medical device research and development.
Published: 2024-12-26
FDA
CDRH
CDRH
FDA-PCCP-AI-DSF-2024
Marketing Submission Recommendations for a Predetermined Change Control Plan for Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Device Software Functions
FDA final guidance (December 2024) on Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs), which streamline change management for AI-enabled medical devices. Modifications described in an authorized PCCP can be implemented without a new premarket submission for each change. It specifies the three elements a PCCP should include: a description of modifications, a modification protocol, and an impact assessment. It puts into practice the statutory framework of section 515C of the FD&C Act, added by FDORA.
Published: 2024-12-04
EU
MDCG
MDCG
MDCG 2024-11
Guidance on qualification of in vitro diagnostic medical devices
Guidance (MDCG 2024-11, published October 2024) on how to determine whether a product qualifies as an in vitro diagnostic medical device (IVD) or IVD accessory under the IVDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/746). It sets out the general principle that qualification depends on the intended purpose given by the manufacturer, as indicated on labelling or in promotional material, and applies the definitions in Article 2(2) and 2(4) of the IVDR. The guidance provides a non-exhaustive set of examples to help distinguish IVDs from borderline cases, including devices falling under the MDR, non-medical products such as ancestry or lifestyle tests, and tests used to monitor the manufacturing of other products such as pharmaceuticals, and recommends using it alongside the Manual on borderline and classification.
Published: 2024-10-01
EU
MDCG
MDCG
MDCG 2022-5 rev.1
Guidance on borderline between medical devices and medicinal products under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices
Revision 1 of MDCG 2022-5 (published 29 October 2024), guidance on the borderline between medical devices and medicinal products under the MDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/745). It covers the core concepts for making this distinction, including the definitions of pharmacological, immunological and metabolic means of action, the treatment of plant-based or herbal substances (to which the same principles as conventional medicinal substances apply), substance-based medical devices (where Rules 3 and 21 are relevant), and combination products of medical devices and medicinal products, illustrated with a flowchart of regulatory outcomes for different scenarios. It confirms that a product containing a medicinal substance can still qualify as a medical device where that substance plays an ancillary role and the principal intended effect is not achieved by pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means. Revision 1 adds new text on products intended solely for cleaning, disinfection or sterilization, clarifying that single-purpose products of this kind are medical devices, while multi-purpose disinfectants fall under the Biocidal Products Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Published: 2024-10-01
JFMDA
Notice
Notice
jfmda_20240924_7f46b062
SaMD Rebalance Notification (Staged Approval) Case Study Collection (Disease Diagnosis SaMD)
Case study collection (published 24 September 2024) prepared by the Japan Federation of Medical Devices Associations (JFMDA, Task Force on the Two-Stage Approval System, Program Medical Device Regulatory Response SWG), building on discussions with the Japan Digital Health Alliance (JaDHA), to promote understanding and appropriate use of the SaMD Rebalance Notification (the notice of 16 November 2023 on the handling of two-stage approval reflecting the characteristics of program medical devices). It covers disease-diagnosis SaMD, the companion volume to a treatment-use version published by JaDHA. The two-stage approval scheme mainly targets SaMD, such as programs that calculate physiological parameters from non-invasive measurements or imaging, that provide reference information whose clinical significance is not yet established; it excludes products where an incorrect result could seriously affect human life or health. The collection presents both applicable and non-applicable examples, intended as a reference for SaMD developers, including venture and IT companies, when planning development strategy and for discussions with regulatory authorities.
Published: 2024-09-24
EU
Law
Law
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act)
EU regulation establishing a risk-based framework for artificial intelligence, dated 13 June 2024 and published in the Official Journal on 12 July 2024. It sets out prohibited practices and requirements for high-risk AI systems. Medical device AI becomes high-risk where it is a safety component of a device, or is itself a device, and is subject to third-party conformity assessment by a notified body (MDCG 2025-6). Requirements for high-risk systems cover data governance, technical documentation, transparency, human oversight, and accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity; a single set of technical documentation is drawn up for the MDR or IVDR and the AI Act. Article 99 sets maximum fines of EUR 35 million or 7% of worldwide annual turnover for prohibited practices, and EUR 15 million or 3% for breaches of operator obligations, whichever is higher. As amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, the high-risk requirements apply from 2 December 2027 for Annex III systems and from 2 August 2028 for Annex I products, which include medical devices.
Published: 2024-07-12
IMDRF
IMDRF/GRRP WG/N47 FINAL:2024 (Edition 2)
Essential Principles of Safety and Performance of Medical Devices and IVD Medical Devices
Edition 2 of the IMDRF guidance providing harmonized Essential Principles of Safety and Performance: the fundamental design and manufacturing requirements a manufacturer is expected to meet so that a medical device or IVD medical device is safe and performs as intended throughout its life cycle. Section 5 sets out principles that apply to all medical devices including IVD medical devices, Section 6 those for medical devices other than IVD medical devices, and Section 7 those that apply only to IVD medical devices. Design and manufacturing activities should be under the control of the manufacturer's quality management system, and conformity with the applicable principles is demonstrated and assessed according to procedures designated by the regulatory authority. The document uses "should" to indicate recommendations and reserves "must" for unavoidable situations, including those mandated by regulation. For the content of labeling, it refers to IMDRF/GRRP WG/N52.
Published: 2024-04-26
MHLW
Notice
Notice
MHLW-PFSB-MDED-0328-No.1
Guidance on Vulnerability Management to Ensure Cybersecurity of Medical Devices
Notice on post-market vulnerability management framework. Requires manufacturers/distributors to integrate vulnerability monitoring, evaluation, response, and disclosure processes (including SBOM utilization) into quality management systems. Mandates establishment of PSIRT structure, clear vulnerability notification policies to customers, and practical end-of-life support management procedures.
Published: 2024-03-28
FDA
CDRH
CDRH
21 CFR Part 820
Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) — 21 CFR Part 820
The FDA quality system regulation for medical device manufacturing. Under the February 2024 final rule, it incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference and was renamed the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR), effective February 2, 2026. It specifies CGMP requirements across manufacturing, including design and development controls (equivalent to former 820.30). The foundational regulation for quality system compliance in simultaneous Japan-US submissions.
Published: 2024-02-02
